<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Patches on Open Source Security</title>
    <link>https://opensourcesecurity.io/tag/patches/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Patches on Open Source Security</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.139.4</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://opensourcesecurity.io/tag/patches/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Half of the AI patches don&#39;t work with Keith Hoodlet</title>
      <link>https://opensourcesecurity.io/2026/2026-10-keith-ai-patches/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://opensourcesecurity.io/2026/2026-10-keith-ai-patches/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Josh talks to Keith Hoodlet about a research project he co-authored about the success rate of AI generated vulnerability patches. Keith has a very scientific approach to this paper and does a great job of breaking down all the data and outcomes. There isn&amp;rsquo;t a lot of AI research that takes this approach, this paper is a breath of fresh air. Keith has some pretty scary details during the discussion, but he manages to give us hope at the end.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
